The Alveolata have been clearly defined thanks to molecular phylogenies. The phylogenies indicate that Alveolata are related to Stramenopila and Rhizaria in a lineage called SAR or Harosa (Figure 215). Alveolata have the common characteristics of having vesicles positioned just under their plasma membrane, forming a kind of alveoli (Figure 294). Their mitochondria have tubular ridges. The alveoli have allowed the evolution of attributes specific to each evolutionary lineage. Note that the Glaucophyta also have alveoli which probably appeared by evolutionary convergence.
Molecular phylogenies distinguish 3 main groups of Alveolata: Ciliophora, Apicomplexa and Dinoflagellata, each having followed a very particular evolutionary process (Figure 295). In addition to these three groups, there are a few minority lines. Note that analyzes of marine picoplankton show that two other as yet unstudied groups of Alveolata exist. These two groups appear to be the major components of picoplankton. Their biology is still completely unknown to us.
Plastids have clearly been present during evolution of the Apicomplexa and Dinoflagellata, but if they were present also in Ciliophora is currently under discussion. Plastids are functional in most Dinoflagellata and have undergone a complex evolution with multiple replacements. They regressed in Apicomplexa, to the point of disappearing completely in some species. Independent regressions were also identified in other Alveolata, which leaves the reason for their absence in Ciliophora unanswered. According to some biologists, these organisms have always been devoid of the plastid and it is the result of a secondary endosymbiosis or kleptoplasty that occurred in the ancestor of the Apicomplexa/Dinoflagellata (Myzozoa; see Figure 40). The predatory members of this lineage are currently capable of myzocytosis, which supports this hypothesis. In this context, the plastid, although also derived from a Rhodophyta, would have a different origin from that of Stramenopila / Haptophyta / Cryptophyta. Another group of biologists supports a common origin to the plastids of Alveolata and those of Stramenopila / Haptophyta / Cryptophyta. This hypothesis brings more complex scenarios of evolution into play. For instance, the plastid would have to have been lost among the Ciliophora. The plastid would have have been kept in the lineage leading to the Apicomplexa, in which it has four membranes, and in the Dinoflagellata, it would have been lost and replaced several times.
Ciliophora
The first diverging Alveolata group is the Ciliophora phylum, commonly known as the ciliates. Their origin is ancient because fossil ciliophora thecae date back to 450 Ma ago. The phylum includes about 7,000 species of single-celled phagotrophs which occupy many ecological niches. There are planktonic and benthic forms, in the sea or in freshwater; others live in moist soils, mosses, etc. A few species live with various symbionts: algae and bacteria. The algae provide carbonaceous matter and the bacteria toxin “killers” which kill individuals who do not harbor them. Some species of Ciliophora are parasites, others are commensal and live in the intestines of various herbivorous mammals. One species, Balantidium coli, occasionally parasitizes humans (Figure 296). A few species, such as Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, are fish parasites and can wreak significant havoc in fish farms or aquariums. In nature, Ciliophora are often the second link in the food chain in ecosystems. They feed on bacteria, algae or other protozoa that they ingest through their cell mouth or cytostome. Experiments have clearly shown that their presence keeps the amount of bacteria in many biotopes low, as they consume up to 90% of bacteria and algae. In the laboratory, it is possible to cultivate the species of the genus Tetrahymena on simple media with nutrients in solution, while members of Paramecium demand living bacteria and Stentor feed on other Ciliophora. Note that the macronuclear genome sequences of Paramecium tetraurelia and Tetrahymena thermophila did not identify genes typically functioning in plastids, suggesting that if the ancestor to these organisms did have a plastid, it did not leave genomic traces.
Most Ciliophora are large in size; Stentor measures up to 2 mm. Ciliophora are very complex with defined morphologies that vary depending on the species. Each cell resembles a “little animal” with a musculoskeletal system, environmental sensing systems and a digestive system comprising a mouth, an intracellular stomach and an apparatus for excreting waste or cytoprect (Figure 296andFigure 297). They are polarized with the presence of a front and a rear. However, the two main characteristics of Ciliophora are the presence of a complex and important ciliature, which gave them their name, and especially the presence of two different types of nuclei, called micronuclei and macronuclei. The ciliature allows rapid movements and facilitates the capture of prey. Micronuclei are diploid and serve only for the transmission of information during reproduction. They are transcriptionally inactive and can be considered “germline” nuclei. Micronuclei have chromosomes and resemble nuclei of eukaryotes in general. They are divided by classical mitoses. Macronuclei, on the other hand, carry fragmented chromosomes and are transcriptionally active. If they divide, it is through a process of partitioning DNA molecules that is not mitosis. The micronuclei therefore form a lineage of germ nuclei specifically devoted to reproduction, while the macronuclei mimic a somatic line and ensure the expression of genetic material. Macronuclei disappear either during cell division or during sexual reproduction. They are resynthesized from micronuclei by modifications of genetic material, in ways that call for epigenetic information (Box 21). Note that depending on the species, there are one or more micronuclei and one or more macronuclei per cell. This particular biology of the nuclei has been accompanied by modifications of the nuclear genetic code in greater proportions than in other organisms. For example, UAA and UAG code for glutamine instead of stop in Tetrahymena, Paramecium and Stylonychia. UAA codes for glutamic acid in Vorticella. The most surprising is found in Euplotes where UGA codes for cysteine or for selenocysteine. Which amino acid is inserted depends on signals present in the messenger RNA, the two amino acids can be inserted via separate UGA codons in the same mRNA! The Ciliophora divide by transverse fission (Figure 297). Their polarization therefore involves complex morphogenetic mechanisms, as the front part must regenerate a rear and vice versa. Some of the morphogenetic processes are inherited in a non-Mendelian way (Box 21). Some species are able to differentiate into a cyst when conditions are unfavorable and to “sleep” for several months. The sexual cycle has been described in many species and follows modalities that are specific to Ciliophora (Figure 297). Often there are systems of mating types that determine compatibilities between cells. These are also sometimes inherited epigenetically (Box 21). Sexual reproduction is necessary for the survival of many Ciliophora clones. Indeed, the life of a clone is divided into three phases which can last up to several hundred divisions. Right after conjugation, there is a first period of immaturity during which the cells divide vigorously but cannot conjugate. After that, a phase of maturity is established where the cells divide vigorously and can conjugate. Finally, there is a phase of senescence where growth slows down and the cells end up dying unless they conjugate or self-fertilize. The first phase is controlled by the production of a protein called “immaturin”. The transition from immaturity to maturity is controlled by processes of gene repression / activation, the details of which are still unknown. The senescence phase appears to be controlled by changes in the macronucleus because the injection of macronuclei from young cells into older cells significantly prolongs the life of the latter.
Long based on morphology, ciliary structure and other ultrastructural features, the classification of Ciliophora has been improved by DNA sequence data. Molecular phylogenies currently define two sub-branches (Figure 298).
Postciliodesmatophora
The Postciliodesmatophora subphylum contains two classes, Karyorelictea and Heterotrichea, whose members exhibit characteristics that appear to be more “primitive” than those of other Ciliophora. Members of the two classes exhibit common structures in the basal body environment, in particular the presence of a ribbon of specific microtubules attached to the basal body called “postciliodesmatum”, confirming the results of molecular phylogenies.
Karyorelictea
There are about 130 species of Karyorelictea that live mainly in coastal sediments; only the genus Loxodes contains freshwater species (Figure 299). The most notable feature of members of this class is the non-dividing macronucleus which has reduced ploidy; in some cases it even seems to remain diploid. Macronuclei are segregated at random during divisions and eventually degenerate. They must therefore be constantly produced from micronuclei. These groups of Ciliophora cannot be cultivated in the laboratory. Some can grow very large, sometimes close to half a centimeter. They have colonized many marine and freshwater environments.
Heterotrichea
There are several hundred species of Heterotrichea (Figure 299). Like Karyorelictea, species of Heterotrichea are usually large, and characterized by division of the macronucleus with the help of microtubules located outside the nucleus. Their name derives from the fact that they have long cilia involved in the formation of a “paraoral” membrane around the cytostome, and smaller cilia on the rest of the cell body. Their body is very deformable; Stentor can, for example, retract into a spherical shape. Some have beautiful red or blue colors.
Intramacronucleata
The second subphylum, that of Intramacronucleata, includes the vast majority of Ciliophora. All members are characterized by the presence of microtubules inside the macronucleus during its division. The subphylum is made up of three major classes and seven minor lineages. These lines are differentiated mainly on the structure of the cilia and are generally confirmed by the sequence data. Nevertheless, convergences in the arrangement of the cilia or the structure of the basal bodies have been identified, making molecular phylogenies important for obtaining a better phylogenetic classification. A first line, containing only one genus, Protocruzia, and a few species, seems to diverge first. However, molecular phylogenies provide conflicting data as to its exact position in the Ciliophora tree and this genus could possibly belong to the Postciliodesmatophora subphylum. These are marine and benthic organisms (Figure 300) whose macronuclear behavior is different from that of other Intramacronucleata, confirming that it could be an early-diverging group, as shown inFigure 298. Indeed, they have a single micronucleus surrounded by ten or so macronuclei. These divide by a process that resembles true mitosis with condensation of the chromosomes and an anaphase-like separation.
Listostomatae
The major class of Intramacronucleata that appears to diverge first is Listostomatae (Figure 298). It contains several hundred species, some of which live free and others in commensal, parasitic or mutualistic symbionts of the vertebrate intestines. The human parasite Balantidium coli (Figure 296) belongs to this class. Some species appear to have a particular diet involving kleptoplasty (see Box 7). Others are very voracious and consume flagellates, ciliates, and even small animals. The sizes vary from about 30 microns to almost 2 mm and the shapes of these Ciliophora are very diverse (Figure 301).
Armophorea
The class of Armophorea is related to that of Listostomatae (Figure 298). It brings together a few hundred species of anaerobic Ciliophora, whose mitochondria have evolved into hydrogenosomes. They thrive in marine or freshwater sediments, the water column of anoxic lakes or in symbionts in the intestines of various animals including ruminants. Some of them harbor methanogenic bacteria. They feed on bacteria and excrete acetate and propionate, which in symbiotic species can be consumed by the host. Most species have the ability to differentiate cysts for their survival or transmission. They have an average size for Ciliophora, i.e. around 100 μm (Figure 301). The shapes adopted vary widely: ovoid, elongated, helmet-shaped, etc.
Spirotrichea
The second important class which then diverges is that of Spirotrichea (Figure 298). With a few thousand species, this class is very diverse with few characteristics that bring the different members together (Figure 302). In particular, the morphology is very variable and the sizes vary from 5 μm to 1 mm, even if most of the members are between 100 and 200 μm. Part of the species are protected in a lorica. The macronuclear genome is often extremely fragmented, a feature they share with Phyllopharyngea and Armophorea, but which appears to have been acquired through convergent evolution in all three classes. The area around the cytostome usually shows structures resembling the paraoral membrane of Heterotrichea, a feature also acquired by convergent evolution. The ciliature is often sparse and the cilia can be grouped together in cirrhia. Some of the better known ciliates such as Euplotes and Stylonychia belong to this class (Figure 302).
Colpodea, Nassophorea, Phyllopharyngea, Prostomatea and Plagiopylea
The next five classes, Colpodea, Nassophorea, Phyllopharyngea, Prostomatea and Plagiopylea, each contain from a few dozen to a few hundred species (Figure 303). The characters shared within each of the classes, which were formed most often by molecular phylogenies, are few in number and essentially ultrastructural. Colpodea are known for their ability to form cysts, allowing them to invade environments that frequently dry out. Sorogena stoianovitchae, a species that evolved an aggregative multicellularity (Figure 304) belongs to this class. Plagiopylea are microaerophilic or anaerobic and like Armophorea have hydrogenosomes. They inhabit the same biotopes as the Armophorea. Certain Phyllopharyngea, the members of the Suctoria subclass, have very particular morphologies, being completely devoid of cilia during the trophic phase (Figure 305); the other members of the class have more canonical morphologies and live free or in companionship of invertebrate animals. These fascinating Ciliophora live attached to many aquatic animals, and differentiate a ciliated form to move (Figure 305).
Oligohymenophorea
The last class of Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea, is the most important in number of species, numbering in the thousands. The members present a diversity of forms (Figure 306) and functions with free species, marine or freshwater, species attached to the substrate in isolation such as Vorticella or grouped in single colonies such as Zoothamnium, parasites of mussels, such as Ophryoglena hemophaga, or fish, such as Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, etc. Sizes vary from 10 μm to over three millimeters! Many species change shape if nutrients are deficient, or for parasitic species when it is time to disperse. The name of Oligohymenophorea comes from the low number of cilia present around the cytostome (cell mouth), a character widely shared within the class. Many known species of ciliates belong to this group, such as Vorticella or the laboratory models Paramecium tetraurelia and Tetrahymena thermophila.
Colponemidia & Acavomonidia
The rest of the known Alveolata appear to form a monophyletic group. However, the phylogenetic positions of Colponemidia and Acavomonidia as shown inFigure 295are not completely assured. These two branches have only a few species each. Colponemidia are small phagotrophic flagellates that present a ventral groove through which they feed (Figure 307). These organisms therefore retain the same “primitive” characteristics as those of Sulcozoa and Excavata, confirming their basal position in the Alveolata tree. Acavomonidia are also phagotrophic flagellates, but lack the ventral groove (Figure 307). As with Ciliophora, no evidence of the presence of a plastid during the evolutionary history of these two organism groups could be found. They are not capable of myzocytosis nor do they have the apical structure that participates in this process, unlike Myzozoa, the collection of Apicomplexa, Dinoflagellata and related minor groups (Figure 295). Likewise, the mitochondrial genome of Colponemidia and Acavomonidia does not exhibit the extreme simplification present in Myzozoa.
Myzozoa
The Myzozoa super-phylum therefore groups together two main groups, the Dinoflagellata and the Apicomplexa, which have strongly diverged from the ancestral type. It seems that their ancestor acquired the ability to cause myzocytosis through the acquisition of an apical complex (Figure 308) that resembles the cytopharynx of Katablepharida (Figure 248). This complex was then used in Apicomplexa to enter cells, making this group intracellular parasites of other eukaryotes. In Dinoflagellata, it would have been used before regressing to repeatedly change the plastid. Indeed, most Myzozoa have plastids. That of Apicomplexa has lost its photosynthetic capacity, but remains functional in certain related algae species, the Chromerida.
In Apicomplexa and Chromerida, the plastid is surrounded by four membranes, an argument put forward to support a common origin to plastids in Hacrobia, Stramenopila and Alveolata. In contrast, in Dinoflagellata, the plastids have various origins (see pages 67-69) and are surrounded by two, three or five membranes! However, none is surrounded by four membranes, which calls into question the presence of a plastid having a unique origin in the Myzozoa… Another shared characteristic of these organisms is the extreme simplification of the coding capacity of the mitochondrial genome of the Myzozoa: it only codes for three proteins, cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunits 1 and 3, and the two ribosomal RNAs.
Chrompodellida
The first monophyletic line of Myzozoa includes Chrompodellida and Apicomplexa (Figure 295). Chrompodellida form a monophyletic line of small phagotrophic flagellates as well as two algae possessing a plastid surrounded by four membranes and containing chlorophyll a, violaxanthin and β carotenes (Figure 309). Transcriptomic analyzes in a phagotrophic species, Voromonas pontica, revealed the presence of transcripts of genes functioning in the plastids, indicating that the non-photosynthetic species have probably used to have plastids but lost them. Molecular phylogenies suggest recurrent plastid loss within the group. Both algae in the group are endosymbionts of corals and have a trophic form without flagellum and a biflagellate zoosporic form; Vitrella brassicaformis is also able to differentiate autospores enclosed in a sporangium (Figure 309). Phagotrophic species like Colpodella feed on other protozoa through myzocytosis using their apical apparatus, which is called pseudoconoid because it does not form a complete cone. They have the ability to differentiate cysts. One of the algae, Chromera velia, has a pseudoconoid, while the other, Vitrella brassicaformis, appears to lack it. Chromera velia is, however, not known to be capable of phagocytosis. Both species are endosymbionts of corals.
Apicomplexa
The Apicomplexa phylum is a group of about 5,000 species all of which are intracellular parasites of other eukaryotes. However, estimates suggest that this is the group of eukaryotes for which the number of species remaining to be described is greatest, as there are estimates of more than 5 million species. It is in this group of organisms that the most devastating human parasites are found (Table 13), such as Plasmodium, responsible for malaria (Box 22), Toxoplasma gondii causing toxoplasmosis, and Cryptosporidium, responsible for cryptosporidiosis in AIDS patients. Other animals are not better off, with coccidia such as Emeria and Theileria which decimates herds in Africa, Babesia which infect cattle and chickens or gregarines affecting insects.
Apicomplexa are characterized mainly by the presence of a complex apical apparatus composed of microtubules and specialized organelles, giving them their name (Figure 308). The mechanism serves for attachment and penetration of Apicomplexan cells into the host cell. The apparatus is associated at least for part of the life cycle with a conoid: the tubulin-based structure that appears to be the trace of the mechanism that was involved in myzocytosis in Apicomplexan ancestors. Apicomplexa have no apparent locomotion devices for most of their cycle, but are nonetheless capable of rapid movements. However, the male microgametes in Plasmodium have a flagellum which provides them with mobility towards the female gamete. Most species have a remnant of a plastid surrounded by four membranes, called an apicoplast. However, the Cryptosporidium seem to have lost it completely and have no trace of it even in their nuclear genome. The Cryptosporidium have also completely lost their mitochondrial genome and only have one mitosome; the other Apicomplexa have the mitochondrial genome typical of Myzozoa encoding three proteins and two ribosomal RNAs.
The phylogeny of these organisms is far from completed, especially as the majority of species remain to be discovered, and gene sequence data has made many changes to the traditional classification (Figure 310). Classically, the Apicomplexa were split into two classes: Aconoidasida and Conoidasida.
Aconoidasida are characterized, as the name suggests, by the fact that the conoid is present only at certain stages of the life cycle, whereas it is present at most stages in Conoidasida. This latter class appears to be paraphyletic with the Aconoidasida probably forming a monophyletic line from within it. The traditional ex-subclasses Coccidia and Gregarinasina, coccidia and gregarines in everyday speech, are most likely polyphyletic. Gregarines are large extracellular parasites inhabiting the internal cavities of invertebrates: intestines, coelomas, reproductive systems, etc. Nearly 2,000 species have been described. Traditionally, they were divided into three orders: Archigregarinorida infecting marine invertebrates, Neogregarinorida attacking only terrestrial invertebrates and Eugregarinorida, the most numerous, having a broad spectrum and parasitizing marine, freshwater or terrestrial invertebrates. Molecular phylogenies show that the last two orders are probably not monophyletic andFigure 310proposes their division into two lineages: Paragregarea and Orthogregarinia. Paragregarea diverge at the base of the Apicomplexa evolutionary tree. All gregarines are characterized by the presence of a head-like apical apparatus at the anterior pole of the cell. The apparatus is called epimerite if it is separated from the rest of the cell body by a septum, delimiting a cell compartment without nucleus, and mucron if it is continuous with the rest of the cell body (Figure 311andFigure 312). This “head” is always present in Archigregarinorida, in which it allows attachment to the host and participates in nutrition through myzocytosis (Figure 313), but is only present during the sporozoite stage in other gregarines. Some species, particularly those classified as “ex” archigregarines, appear to have completely lost the plastid, while a vestige of it is present in other gregarines. Most species have a sexual cycle (Figure 314) and a few species have the possibility of asexual multiplication by schizogony. They only need one host to complete their life cycle. Coccidia are small intracellular parasites that infect animals; several thousand species have been described. Some of these organisms have now been separated into independent subclasses, restricting Coccidia to a defined set of parasites related to Aconoidasida (Figure 310).